Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

The General Movie Thread

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Ubik
    replied
    Wriggly Scott has been losing his ability to make good films for years now. I have pretty much zero interest in the new Alien film because of this.

    Leave a comment:


  • Jonas
    replied
    Originally posted by Looney View Post
    Okay so I finished watching Oliver Stone's Alexander (2004) last night. What went wrong here? I wouldn't say this is a bad movie, though there are some surprisingly poorly directed moments, but it is what I would call a failed effort. There just seems to be something missing in this epic. There seems to be a spark that is absent. I feel that Collin Farrell is putting in the effort, but I am not captivated by his performance. The character he brings to life just doesn't come off like the character the movie seems to want to portray. Many of the other performances don't really stand out either. I guess my point is that the effort put into this massive project should have yielded better results.
    It's a combination of the horrific screenplay (which fails to capture the fascinating aspects of those people and that time in pretty much every way) and some of the worst casting I've ever seen. Not because the actors are bad, but because they're hilariously inappropriate for their parts. I mean, Angelina Jolie as Colin Farrell's mum? Did she have him when she was one year old?

    It's a movie that seems to yearn to be about something, but doesn't seem to have the ability to reach for it. Which really bugs me, because Alexander is one of the most fascinating historical figures you could make a movie about.

    Leave a comment:


  • Looney
    replied
    Originally posted by Ubik View Post
    Have you read the Dan Clowes comic this is based on?
    I have not. I actually saw the movie on the spur of the moment.

    Leave a comment:


  • Ubik
    replied
    Originally posted by Looney View Post
    I saw Wilson today in St. Louis. It had its moments, but I don't think I will ever be seeing it again. I laughed, but I think there was a little too much me and a little too much of people I can't stand in the lead character, Wilson. The cast is REALLY good.
    Have you read the Dan Clowes comic this is based on? Very funny, but very dark humour. Basically a series of 6 panel gag strips that gradually paint a picture of Wilson's life. Clever piece of cartooning. Curious to see the film.

    Leave a comment:


  • Looney
    replied
    Okay so I finished watching Oliver Stone's Alexander (2004) last night. What went wrong here? I wouldn't say this is a bad movie, though there are some surprisingly poorly directed moments, but it is what I would call a failed effort. There just seems to be something missing in this epic. There seems to be a spark that is absent. I feel that Collin Farrell is putting in the effort, but I am not captivated by his performance. The character he brings to life just doesn't come off like the character the movie seems to want to portray. Many of the other performances don't really stand out either. I guess my point is that the effort put into this massive project should have yielded better results.

    Leave a comment:


  • Looney
    replied
    Originally posted by Dawnchild View Post
    I watched the much hyped sci fi-movie "Arrival" recently and though it is a very good film in many respects (acting/story/visuals etc) it still lacked something for me.. some magic, some wonder.. some emotion.. a thrill.. a satisfying resolution.. that 'little extra' that classic films like Spielberg's "Close Encounters" have..

    Perhaps it is in part a lack of aliens ("Arrival" has aliens but not in the conventional sense), or perhaps the film simply became a bit too 'psychological-realistic' for me (a trend also seen in newer films like "Gravity" and "Interstellar").

    I enjoy most sci fi tbh (have lots of film-favourites + series like "B5"/"Farscape"/"Firefly") but more the sci-fi of 'YesterYear' I find.. perhaps I am more of a 'traditionalist' when it comes to sci-fi, I don't know..
    I completely agree. I also found The Arrival to be good, but lacking. And yes it seems like films today are trying to do Science Fiction with a new twist and the new twists aren't always very entertaining. Like I said, The Arrival is well acted, well scripted, well shot, but I still didn't feel that interested or invested in the story.

    Leave a comment:


  • Dawnchild
    replied
    I watched the much hyped sci fi-movie "Arrival" recently and though it is a very good film in many respects (acting/story/visuals etc) it still lacked something for me.. some magic, some wonder.. some emotion.. a thrill.. a satisfying resolution.. that 'little extra' that classic films like Spielberg's "Close Encounters" have..

    Perhaps it is in part a lack of aliens ("Arrival" has aliens but not in the conventional sense), or perhaps the film simply became a bit too 'psychological-realistic' for me (a trend also seen in newer films like "Gravity" and "Interstellar").

    I enjoy most sci fi tbh (have lots of film-favourites + series like "B5"/"Farscape"/"Firefly") but more the sci-fi of 'YesterYear' I find.. perhaps I am more of a 'traditionalist' when it comes to sci-fi, I don't know..

    Leave a comment:


  • Looney
    replied
    I saw Assassin's Creed Saturday night. I can't say I loved it. I only played the second game and I did enjoy it, but the movie fell pretty flat for me, especially the ending. Having said this, I would watch a sequel just to see where they go with it because, as I said, I did enjoy the second game - not that it really has much to do with what they'll do in any future movie releases.

    Leave a comment:


  • Looney
    replied
    I saw Wilson today in St. Louis. It had its moments, but I don't think I will ever be seeing it again. I laughed, but I think there was a little too much me and a little too much of people I can't stand in the lead character, Wilson. The cast is REALLY good.

    Leave a comment:


  • WorkerCaste
    replied
    We did go and see it today. I thought it was enjoyable, but not great. Loved Kevin, Emma, Emma and Ewan. I wished there had been more of Stanley Tucci. I thought Luke Evans did a very good Gaston. I didn't care for Josh Gad's LeFou or Dan Stevens Beast. As far as the story goes, I liked that they smoothed oven some of the plot points I had always found troubling with the original, e.g. Why were the staff punished? Why did the sources curse and run? Why didn't the village know about the castle and prince?

    Beyond those small items, it's hard to say too much about it since it hews so closely to the animated original.

    Leave a comment:


  • Shan'waia
    replied
    Originally posted by Jan View Post
    Anybody here see the live-action 'Beauty and the Beast'? I enjoyed it. Mostly I was curious to see Dan Stevens (from Downton Abbey) in something else.
    Ahahaha! This is a funny story. I'm not big on the live action remakes, and I also don't like Stevens, so I wasn't going to see it.

    But my sister wanted to see it. It was her first real move theater experience as a kid, and it's special to her. So when she found out I wasn't going to watch it, well, I quote her verbatim:

    Sister: No! Nuh-uh! Absolutely not. You are coming to see it with me at the Drafthouse and you will LIKE IT!

    Well, if it means THAT much to you!

    So we went and it was fun. Not as good as the old movie, and I still don't like Stevens, but Josh Gad stole the show anyway so who cares. lol

    ...What else is out right now? I'm really bad about keeping up with new movies. I used to be better about it but then i grew up and had to pay bills. lol

    Leave a comment:


  • WorkerCaste
    replied
    My wife and I have plans to see it, hopefully this weekend.

    Leave a comment:


  • Jan
    replied
    Anybody here see the live-action 'Beauty and the Beast'? I enjoyed it. Mostly I was curious to see Dan Stevens (from Downton Abbey) in something else.

    Leave a comment:


  • Looney
    replied
    Originally posted by Jonas View Post
    As a pulpy adventure film, Kong: Skull Island was fun. Nothing special, not even as an adventure movie, but solid fun with a nice atmosphere and some nice moments.
    I completely agree. I think that is why I was a bit disappointed. From what I had heard I was expecting something special, but really it was just a "solid fun with a nice atmosphere and some nice moments."

    Leave a comment:


  • Jonas
    replied
    As a pulpy adventure film, Kong: Skull Island was fun. Nothing special, not even as an adventure movie, but solid fun with a nice atmosphere and some nice moments.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X