Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

B5 fan + B5 script writer = WIN!

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • AmyG
    replied
    Can't wait, but don't want to see any clips beforehand!

    Leave a comment:


  • Dan Dassow
    replied
    Speaking of Neil Gaiman:
    'Doctor Who' Preview: A 'Today' Show Cameo, New Clips, And Neil Gaiman!
    Posted 10 hrs ago by Rick Marshall in News
    MTV

    ... Earlier this week, former Today show co-host Meredith Vieira recently visited the Cardiff set of "Doctor Who" for a fun segment on the series. You can watch it in full on the show's website, but I've clipped a particularly funny exchange with star Matt Smith that you can check out below:

    In other "Doctor Who" news, next week's premiere of "The Doctor's Wife" is getting a lot of extra attention thanks to the involvement of noted comic book writer and novelist Neil Gaiman.

    Multiple previews and clips from the episode have found their way online at both the BBC UK and BBC America websites. You can watch a few of them below, and it also might be worth a look back at my interview with Gaiman conducted almost a year ago, in which he offers up some vague hints about the episode and described his history with "Doctor Who."

    Here's the trailer for "The Doctor's Wife," which airs this Saturday at 9 PM Eastern on BBC America: ...

    Leave a comment:


  • AmyG
    replied
    It's fine, Dan. Congratulations to Nicole Quinn, and I hope the other entrants all had fun, at least!

    Leave a comment:


  • Dan Dassow
    replied
    Bookperk just announced the Winner of the Neil Gaiman Audio Contest about 15 minutes ago. Everyone who voted should receive the notification, if you did not cancel your Bookperk account.

    I will leave it to Amy to determine whether she wants the name of the winner posted here.
    Last edited by Dan Dassow; 05-09-2011, 06:46 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • Karen
    replied
    Originally posted by AmyG View Post
    Karen, probably because people can't be responsible for all of the folks who are voting for them. Some crazy person could see your picture, decide you look like their first girlfriend, and want to throw you hundreds of fraudulent votes. That wouldn't be your fault. So, they threw out the fraudulent votes but kept the entrants ù who could very well have had nothing to do with the fraud.
    Originally posted by Dan Dassow View Post
    From more paranoid and cynical perspective: if Harper Collins had the policy of throwing out entrants with a sizeable amount of fraudulent votes, throwing fraudulent votes in the direction of a competitor would be the surest way to disqualify that competitor.
    Both valid points. I wish we lived in a world where people wouldn't think of cheating and played by the rules........

    Leave a comment:


  • Dan Dassow
    replied
    Originally posted by AmyG View Post
    Karen, probably because people can't be responsible for all of the folks who are voting for them. Some crazy person could see your picture, decide you look like their first girlfriend, and want to throw you hundreds of fraudulent votes. That wouldn't be your fault. So, they threw out the fraudulent votes but kept the entrants ù who could very well have had nothing to do with the fraud.
    From more paranoid and cynical perspective: if Harper Collins had the policy of throwing out entrants with a sizeable amount of fraudulent votes, throwing fraudulent votes in the direction of a competitor would be the surest way to disqualify that competitor.

    Leave a comment:


  • AmyG
    replied
    Karen, probably because people can't be responsible for all of the folks who are voting for them. Some crazy person could see your picture, decide you look like their first girlfriend, and want to throw you hundreds of fraudulent votes. That wouldn't be your fault. So, they threw out the fraudulent votes but kept the entrants ù who could very well have had nothing to do with the fraud.

    Leave a comment:


  • Karen
    replied
    I'm kinda curious what the criteria was for keeping and eliminating the contestants. Why weren't all the people with fraudulent votes eliminated? Why were some with very few fraudulent votes eliminated, while those with a lot got to stay in the top 20? Hopefully if they do this again they'll be able to keep a better track of the legitimate votes and also have a statement in place that any fraud will result in forfeiting any prize.

    Leave a comment:


  • AmyG
    replied
    Thanks, Dan, I did notice that. I'm kind of sad that Andy Ihnatko got to stay in the top 20. He's a columnist for a major newspaper (Chicago Sun-Times), and a very well known blogger (and he used to hang around Roger Ebert's Compuserve forum back in the day, making suggestions for his Movie Glossary ù I have to confess, those were fun days and I liked him back then!). Somehow, it doesn't seem in the spirit of the contest to have famous people get to compete against the rest of us mooks, but Andy disagrees in his blog!

    Leave a comment:


  • Dan Dassow
    replied
    Originally posted by AmyG View Post
    Okay, it's all over! And, I am not among the finalists. Nonetheless, thank you ALL for your amazing confidence-building and support, and for your good friendship. If you're interested to see the finalists, they are here:

    Neil Gaiman contest finalists

    Amy, ALL of your votes were obtained honestly. You lost none of your votes when Harper Collins made their vote adjustments.

    Code:
                              05/02/11		
    R1  R2 R3 New  Name	  5:06:08 PM Final Delta
     1   1  1      ihnatko    2001       1915    -86
     3   2  2      misterfizz 1778       1770     -8
     6   3  3      IKtheTroll 1721       1719     -2
     9   4  4      DarlaMoore 1704       1704      0
    11   6  5      rpincus    1701       1697     -4
    12   7  6      mzaudiogrl 1698       1689     -9
     8   8  7      natheyde   1710       1662    -48
    15  10  8      goldenally 1644       1644      0
    17  11  9      bwalton    1636       1636      0
    18  13 10      mormolyke  1630       1629     -1
    19  14 11      emilyesse  1626       1626      0
    10   5 12      Juice      1703       1703      0
    22  16 13 new  BluLeopard 1608       1608      0
    13   9 14      mt1848     1657       1657      0
    23  17 15 new  cnovales   1587       1572    -15
    24  18 16 new  Bradfromga 1540       1540      0
    16  12 17      harlekin   1642       1632    -10
     4  20 18      josborn    1777       1521   -256
    26  23 19 new  bigjerbear 1457       1425    -32
    29  25 20 new  nicoconut  1378       1365    -13
    .. ... .. .... .......... ....       ....  .....
    21  15	  elim clemens    1617       1617      0
     7  19	  elim NomudaJ    1717       1537   -180
     2  26	  elim Joeysghost 1814       1357   -457
     5  27	  elim Bohanski   1760       1335   -425
    20  29	  elim akoski     1619       1205   -414
    14 125	  elim skpeed101  1649        206  -1443
    .. ... .. .... .......... ....       ....  .....
    28        elim MCW        1420             -1420
    .. ... .. .... .......... ....       ....  .....
    57  55         fjordstone  537	      537      0

    R1 = Rank at the end of the contest
    R2 = Rank after adjustment
    R3 = Final rank
    new = Made top 20 after end of contest
    elim = Eliminated from top 20 after end of contest
    Last edited by Dan Dassow; 05-04-2011, 09:52 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • AmyG
    replied
    Okay, it's all over! And, I am not among the finalists. Nonetheless, thank you ALL for your amazing confidence-building and support, and for your good friendship. If you're interested to see the finalists, they are here:

    Neil Gaiman contest finalists

    Leave a comment:


  • AmyG
    replied
    Very interesting. People are also complaining about lost votes, people who got messages saying they had already voted that day when they hadn't, etc. etc. Makes me think they might have to allow more than 20 into round 2, just to bolster the appearance of fairness... I still probably won't make it in, but I'll be interested to see how they handle it all.

    Leave a comment:


  • Dan Dassow
    replied
    Originally posted by AmyG View Post
    Dan, I am VERY interested. I've heard that they have started adjusting the votes already; the top 20 apparently already looks very different (some people are using the links on loath.org ù which are frozen from the end of the contest ù to view the top scorers and watch their numbers change).

    Again, thanks so much to ALL who supported me so tirelessly through this process!
    Amy, I emailed to you an Excel workbook with the plots.


    Code:
                          5/2/2011
    R1 R2 New Name        17:06    Final  Delta
     1  1     ihnatko     2001      1915    -86
     3  2     misterfizz  1778      1770     -8
     6  3     IKtheTroll  1721      1719     -2
     9  4     DarlaMoore  1704      1704      0
    10  5     Juice       1703      1703      0
    11  6     rpincus     1701      1697     -4
    12  7     mzaudiogrl  1698      1689     -9
     8  8     natheyde    1710      1662    -48
    13  9     mt1848      1657      1657      0
    15 10     goldenally  1644      1644      0
    17 11     bwalton     1636      1636      0
    16 12     harlekin    1642      1632    -10
    18 13     mormolyke   1630      1629     -1
    19 14     emilyesse   1626      1626      0
    21 15 New clemens     1617      1617      0
    22 16 New BluLeopard  1608      1608      0
    23 17 New cnovales    1587      1572    -15
    24 18 New Bradfromga  1540      1540      0
     7 19     NomudaJ     1717      1537   -180
     4 20     josborn     1777      1521   -256
    Last edited by Dan Dassow; 05-03-2011, 08:59 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • AmyG
    replied
    Dan, I am VERY interested. I've heard that they have started adjusting the votes already; the top 20 apparently already looks very different (some people are using the links on loath.org ù which are frozen from the end of the contest ù to view the top scorers and watch their numbers change).

    Again, thanks so much to ALL who supported me so tirelessly through this process!

    Leave a comment:


  • Dan Dassow
    replied
    Originally posted by AmyG View Post
    Thank you, Karen! Apparently though, it isn't over yet: I just learned today that Bookperk has hired a third party company to verify the results, so perhaps some number of people will be bounced for fraudulent voting. Quite a few people joined up in the last couple of days and quickly shot to over a thousand, which is suspect at best...
    Amy, I plotted the historical data (tab separated) from http://loath.org/aneel/random/bookperk/latest.html

    I only saw three entries in the top 20 that look suspicious: ihnatko, misterfizz, and NomudaJ.

    Thanks go to aneel at loath dot org for providing the data.

    Amy's fans have been very consistent in their voting. On average, 31.279 people voted per day.

    R-square = 0.9967

    If you are interested I can post the graphs of the data.

    Dan Dassow
    Last edited by Dan Dassow; 05-02-2011, 09:31 PM.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X