If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
Music from the film maybe? It's getting close enough that they may have started scoring it. I like this trailer a lot better than the last one. You get a sense of big adventure here. I like what I'm seeing from Kirk.
Not bad. I didn't care for the "man" line from Kirk.
Also, considering ST's checkered past with canonicity, this movie shouldn't be a problem for anybody.
Recently, there was a reckoning. It occurred on November 4, 2014 across the United States. Voters, recognizing the failures of the current leadership and fearing their unchecked abuses of power, elected another party as the new majority. This is a first step toward preventing more damage and undoing some of the damage already done. Hopefully, this is as much as will be required.
The music sounds to me like a somewhat re-orchestrated version of the new Batman theme by Zimmer/Howard from Batman Begins/The Dark Knight. The music in the first trailer was a re-orchestrated version of the Children of Dune score by Brian Tyler:
After a quick listen, track #8 (Like A Dog Chasing Cars) on the TDK soundtrack is extremely close to the trailer music.. the theme also repeats in #14 (A Dark Knight).
Not bad. I didn't care for the "man" line from Kirk.
Also, considering ST's checkered past with canonicity, this movie shouldn't be a problem for anybody.
Since JJ Abrahms' intent with the film is to completely reboot the ST universe (Something JMS himself offered nearly 4 years ago), I see it as an opportunity to re-write the canon as well.
I'm enough of a Trek purist that I got really p.o.'d with several of the antics in ST Voyager and Enterprise (nearly impossible to do a good "prequel," tho nods to JMS for doing it up right in the single movie, "In the Beginning"...), yet I saw each as adding new value to the franchise. I think (I hope) the same will be true for the new film.
Now, if it isn't a forbidden topic, once the film is shown, what are the odds we can convince JMS to again offer to reboot the television franchise with an arc-based story a'la B5?
Cheers!
Last edited by the0wl; 03-08-2009, 08:16 PM.
Reason: lost a word...
the0wl
=======
...and the rock cried out, "No hiding place!"
Not impressed. At all.
Fucking crewmen?! Gimme a break!
Still, I'm gonna watch it to see whether my first impression was right or not.
And you expect -- what? A mixed male/female crew beginning a 5-year mission while still in their early reproductive primes to be monastic? That might have been marginally "ok" for TV in the black-and-white, ultra-moral '60s, but it isn't gonna cut it today, or, maybe ever again for that matter.
The movie franchise moved to showing unisex quarters in the '70s-'80s, while the TV franchise had a crew marriage ('60s), a captain having a affairs ('80s - one civilian, one crew member), crew affairs ('80s-'90s) crew marital troubles ('90s), a captain getting engaged ('90s), a pregnant crewman ('90s), and so on...
Get over it, already... People (and societies) do grow up...
Cheers;
the0wl
=======
...and the rock cried out, "No hiding place!"
thehe... get a grip, pal. I don't give a flying fart about sex scenes.
Nip/Tuck and Californication are amongst my favorite tv series of all times.
So I couldn't care less if they showed the whole crew enganging into a giant extatic gang bang or SM session under the influence of some mystic rays or psychic manipulation or whatever.
But really: Isn't there enough more interesting stuff in this flick's story to show than fucking crewmen? If so, then it has to be pretty lame anyway...
And you know what they say. The trailer usually shows the best parts of the movie...
Also, it kind of reminded me of the fact that TNT tried to force the inclusion of more explicit sex scenes onto JMS as a condition for the continuation of Crusade...
Last edited by I love Lyta; 03-09-2009, 06:17 AM.
Reason: Grammar
You can find on their video page that they wrote the music to Trailer#2.
While in the first moment I also thought that it's from "The Dark Knight" soundtrack (down to the trombone and tuba playing) it goes in a very different direction (and the underlying two-note motif in the strings is a slightly different one than in TDK), so I think that they used it as a kind of "hook", since "The Dark Knight" was seen by a lot of people and the theme featured prominently (though, that might also be only me personal impression, since I know the soundtrack very well).
Just to clarify, what do you mean by this? Do you mean "OMG, we actually see Kirk having sex with someone?" or "OMG, those fucking crewmen!" I desperately want to rebuttal but I want to know what I'm rebutting first, lol.
You can find on their video page that they wrote the music to Trailer#2.
While in the first moment I also thought that it's from "The Dark Knight" soundtrack (down to the trombone and tuba playing) it goes in a very different direction (and the underlying two-note motif in the strings is a slightly different one than in TDK), so I think that they used it as a kind of "hook", since "The Dark Knight" was seen by a lot of people and the theme featured prominently (though, that might also be only me personal impression, since I know the soundtrack very well).
Thanks for the info, but I don't think they actually write the music. I think, from what I can tell from their site, they take other music then re-orchestrate it to fit the video in the trailer. The base music is from TDK, but I think they just messed with it a little to make it fit. Cool site though!
But really: Isn't there enough more interesting stuff in this flick's story to show than fucking crewmen? If so, then it has to be pretty lame anyway...
And you know what they say. The trailer usually shows the best parts of the movie...
No, the trailer usually shows what the marketers think will bring in the most people. And, gee, "sex sells" is a cliche for a reason!
Not impressed. At all.
Fucking crewmen?! Gimme a break!
Still, I'm gonna watch it to see whether my first impression was right or not.
LMAO. Kirk not screwing attractive women would be far worse. The only difference is that its 2009, this time round, we get to see it (or the first 30 seconds ).
"Books and ideas are the most effective weapons against intolerance and ignorance."
-- Lyndon Baines Johnson, February 11, 1964
Comment