Stumbled on this one, kind of funny at times:
JMS responding to criticism about B5 being crap by virtue of product placement of sorts:
So in other words 2001 and Blade Runner don't qualify as decent SF?
I put this in the "get a life" category. If seeing a name of a
product on the back of a wall "consumes the great potential of the
series," if that's all the person can see...I'm sorry, but that's that
person's problem, not mine.
-snip-
Yessir...we've certainly seen how Blade Runner and 2001 and the
Terminator and Alien Nation and Enemy Mine have been ruined for all time by such things.
-snip-
How ANYONE can turn to me and say with a straight face that this kind of commercialism (done twice in one year) will ruin B5 and use STAR TREK -- STAR frigging TREK, the single most merchandised, licensed property in the history of television -- as an example of SF purity is out of his mind. It was STAR TREK, as noted in Engel's book, and Shatner's as well I believe, that stuck an IDIC symbol in in order to merchandise it; it's STAR TREK that changed Federation costumes between TNG and DS9 specifically so they would have another whole set of costumes to merchandise.
-snip-
We have *nothing* to apologize for. And I suggest to this person, as he sits wearing his Star Trek uniform, and his Star Trek communicator pin and his Star Trek phaser, and his Star Trek PJs, beside his collection of Star Trek pins, shirts, iron-ons, glow-in-the-dark Kirks and Spocks, Enterprise models, books and cutouts...as they say in the bible, take the log out of your own eye before you try to remove the splinter from your neighbor's eye. To hold up Star Trek: The Franchise as the model of untouched non-commercial purity is the most laughable thing I have heard in *years*.
I put this in the "get a life" category. If seeing a name of a
product on the back of a wall "consumes the great potential of the
series," if that's all the person can see...I'm sorry, but that's that
person's problem, not mine.
-snip-
Yessir...we've certainly seen how Blade Runner and 2001 and the
Terminator and Alien Nation and Enemy Mine have been ruined for all time by such things.
-snip-
How ANYONE can turn to me and say with a straight face that this kind of commercialism (done twice in one year) will ruin B5 and use STAR TREK -- STAR frigging TREK, the single most merchandised, licensed property in the history of television -- as an example of SF purity is out of his mind. It was STAR TREK, as noted in Engel's book, and Shatner's as well I believe, that stuck an IDIC symbol in in order to merchandise it; it's STAR TREK that changed Federation costumes between TNG and DS9 specifically so they would have another whole set of costumes to merchandise.
-snip-
We have *nothing* to apologize for. And I suggest to this person, as he sits wearing his Star Trek uniform, and his Star Trek communicator pin and his Star Trek phaser, and his Star Trek PJs, beside his collection of Star Trek pins, shirts, iron-ons, glow-in-the-dark Kirks and Spocks, Enterprise models, books and cutouts...as they say in the bible, take the log out of your own eye before you try to remove the splinter from your neighbor's eye. To hold up Star Trek: The Franchise as the model of untouched non-commercial purity is the most laughable thing I have heard in *years*.
Leave a comment: