The whole peer pressure attitude with the talk show hosts made me a bit sick, honestly. There seemed to be a whole lot of 'armchair quarterbacks' deciding what the Hosts should be doing with their own money.
Jan
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
JMS Reports
Collapse
X
-
I wasn't knocking your comments; just making a general observation about how Leno seemed to be getting some bad press out of the situation, a bit unfairly I think.
Leave a comment:
-
Didn't mean to sound like I was penalizing him -- he's shelling out the bucks, and in my book that's pretty damn good. I don't know how much a crew like that costs a week, but I bet he's contributing more than the cost of donuts for the strike lines!
Leave a comment:
-
I think Leno may be getting a bad rap for this, considering, A) his company doesn't actually own the Tonight Show, B) NBC has been quite obviously in elbowing him out for Conan soon, and C) only a few days had actually gone by between the time the lay-offs were announced and Jay said he was shelling out money for them. Considering Jay had shown his solidarity with the writers from early on by walking off the show, I'm not about to penalize him because he didn't make an announcment earlier.
Leave a comment:
-
Actually I think all the night-time shows' hosts have been paying crew. Daly paid for 1 week, but then he went back to work without writers so the crew wouldn't be let go. I guess he doesn't have the same cash reserves of Letterman, Leno, etc. I think I heard that Letterman was the first, and Leno was the last succumbing to a bit of peer pressure.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by FuryPilot View PostThe strike is absolutely affecting folks. Production is basically shut down at the moment, so lots of folks are not getting a paycheck.
David Letterman is one exception -- his production company, Worldwide Pants, is keeping the staff of the Letterman show and the Late Late Show with Craig Ferguson in paychecks at least until the new year.
FP
As for the amount of money the studios are loosing, they are reducing their tax load for this year. Evidently the Hollywood types haven't spent enough time watching B5, otherwise they would understand the cardinal rule of civilized life, 'We must be kind to one another.'
In fact while watching 'Objects in Motion' this morning after work, I got really peeved at JMS....
Peeved 'cause he has seen into the hearts of man(this includes women) and has captured these truths in writing.
cut short...duty calls...
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Andrew_Swallow View PostI an hearing reports that the strike is effecting the Christmas of actors, technicians and writers.
David Letterman is one exception -- his production company, Worldwide Pants, is keeping the staff of the Letterman show and the Late Late Show with Craig Ferguson in paychecks at least until the new year.
FP
Leave a comment:
-
I an hearing reports that the strike is effecting the Christmas of actors, technicians and writers.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Andrew_Swallow View Post$20 million a day is $7300 million a year. That sounds like the total turnover. Since the theatre screens and the TV screens have not gone blank yet I suspect that someone is exaggerating. However the figure may be true by February.
Even though the talks have broken off again, let's hope AMPTP wakes up soon.
CE
Leave a comment:
-
$20 million a day is $7300 million a year. That sounds like the total turnover. Since the theatre screens and the TV screens have not gone blank yet I suspect that someone is exaggerating. However the figure may be true by February.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Joe Nazzaro View PostHere's an interesting question: if the strike is costing Hollywood a reported $20 million a day as some estimates have said, haven't the producers already lost more than they would have spent by giving the writers what they wanted in the first place?
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Joe Nazzaro View PostAnthony, I think they had something like six demands that annoyed the producers, including the right to strike, authority over reality TV and animation writers and a few others. Personally, I think the writers should have come in with a dozen demands, so when the producers eventually have to come back to the table, they can drop some of them, just like a writer putting an extra dozen F-words into a script knowing he's eventually going to have to take some of them out.
Here's an interesting question: if the strike is costing Hollywood a reported $20 million a day as some estimates have said, haven't the producers already lost more than they would have spent by giving the writers what they wanted in the first place?
The point I find interesting is: "the guild's refusal to remove certain demands from the bargaining table." This is what JMS was referring to. The absolute solidarity of the guild this time around. The studios picked a fight with the wrong kid this time.
CE
Leave a comment:
-
Oh yeah, there was also a proposal about having an outside party determine 'fair market value,' which means that say, Fox can't sell repeats for a Fox-owned show to another Fox outlet at a bargain basement price, thus cheating the writers out of profits. By working from a fair market value, Fox would still have to pay off what the property was worth, even if they sold it below its market value. Small wonder the moguls don't like that one!
Leave a comment:
-
Anthony, I think they had something like six demands that annoyed the producers, including the right to strike, authority over reality TV and animation writers and a few others. Personally, I think the writers should have come in with a dozen demands, so when the producers eventually have to come back to the table, they can drop some of them, just like a writer putting an extra dozen F-words into a script knowing he's eventually going to have to take some of them out.
Here's an interesting question: if the strike is costing Hollywood a reported $20 million a day as some estimates have said, haven't the producers already lost more than they would have spent by giving the writers what they wanted in the first place?
Leave a comment:
-
One side-effect of this...after the sales on B5:TLT came in, way
exceeding WB's projections, they initiated talks about what to do
next, including commissioning more DVDs. Looking at the calendar, I
suggested that they might want to hurry the bureaucratic process
because we were going to be in a strike situation soon, so if they
wanted to move, they'd better commision a script fast.
And they said in response, and I quote verbatim, "We don't want to be
pressured in the process because we know there's not going to be a
strike this year, we can handle the Guild."
Face, wood-chipper. Wood-chipper, face.
I don't know that the suits are doing all that well right now. They're realizing already that the writers are more resolved and unified than ever. Thus the "secret" talks they've jumped into recently. Unfortunately, the suits just walked on the strikes because the writer still refuse to give in on certain issues:
The Alliance of Motion Picture & Television Producers blamed the latest break-off on the guild's refusal to remove certain demands from the bargaining table. Those include a call for first-time jurisdiction over reality TV and animation writing, the management group said.
CE
Leave a comment:
Leave a comment: