Originally posted by Capt.Montoya
You know, I get the impression that no matter how he says it, Grumbler does believe the rumors and supports the campaign.
I understand the weariness from Amy and Jan, but I fear that weariness might have make you concentrate on a few statements (negative, or just not positive enough) out of their context. If you put them in the context of the parts I emphasized you might see grumbler's comments differently.
Maybe grumbler could express himself better, or make it more explicit that he supports the letter writing?
Now let's all take a deep breath and "we will all come together in a better place" ,)
You know, I get the impression that no matter how he says it, Grumbler does believe the rumors and supports the campaign.
I understand the weariness from Amy and Jan, but I fear that weariness might have make you concentrate on a few statements (negative, or just not positive enough) out of their context. If you put them in the context of the parts I emphasized you might see grumbler's comments differently.
Maybe grumbler could express himself better, or make it more explicit that he supports the letter writing?
Now let's all take a deep breath and "we will all come together in a better place" ,)
My argument was simply that those who believe that there is a movie in the works have only hints and rumors (okay, strong hints and rumoprs, but still just hints and rumors) to base their belief on. Some of those very same people, when confronted with a truth they don't like, poo-pooh the idea of "casting troubles" because the reports of "casting troubles" are based on hints and rumors. Before they will take action they need "proof."
I merely point out the logical inconsistency of the decision to believe inthe movie's existance but not take action, in both cases sans "proof."
Comment