New B5 Unofficial Guide to be published in October 2017

[Triple F]

There was talk of an image heavy book focusing on the Art Department at one point which John Iacovelli announced during a recorded panel a few years back – was going to be in much the same style as the B5 at 20 book - but that doesn’t appear to have moved forward much, or at least nothing more has been said.

I’m more than a little surprised that B5 books have never approached the likes of Steve Burg or anyone from Foundation Imaging as there’s a genuine wealth of material that could fill a book or two right there. Same for the prosthetic make up – the two areas of the show which won an Emmy and there’s no official books?! Wardrobe is another obvious area. . . There's plenty of potential as far as new printed material is concerned.

As for the revised and updated Babylon 5 Historical Database, I really thought that would have been part of this new in-universe encyclopaedia. Seems like an obvious thing to include as they would dovetail pretty nicely.

[Looney]

I hope not, as I would like to see my fully revised and updated Babylon 5 Historical Database published!!!

I'd like to see it revised and published based on new material being released in the Babylon 5 Universe.

[b5historyman]

I'd like to see it revised and published based on new material being released in the Babylon 5 Universe.

I always encourage people to email [email protected] and ask. The more the interest the more I hope they will.

[Ubik]

There was talk of an image heavy book focusing on the Art Department at one point which John Iacovelli announced during a recorded panel a few years back – was going to be in much the same style as the B5 at 20 book - but that doesn’t appear to have moved forward much, or at least nothing more has been said.

I’m more than a little surprised that B5 books have never approached the likes of Steve Burg or anyone from Foundation Imaging as there’s a genuine wealth of material that could fill a book or two right there. Same for the prosthetic make up – the two areas of the show which won an Emmy and there’s no official books?! Wardrobe is another obvious area. . . There's plenty of potential as far as new printed material is concerned.

As for the revised and updated Babylon 5 Historical Database, I really thought that would have been part of this new in-universe encyclopaedia. Seems like an obvious thing to include as they would dovetail pretty nicely.

I know you have mixed feelings on B5 Books in general, but you'd be the person to consult on this and provide some links to key people if it were to happen. Might be worth reaching out to Jaclyn. I know you've stated before you have little to no interest in working on a book that coverse the visual FX side, but B5 Scrolls has documented this area so well, it'd be almost criminal for you not to be involved. Just my 2p on the matter.

[Triple F]

I know you have mixed feelings on B5 Books in general, but you'd be the person to consult on this and provide some links to key people if it were to happen. Might be worth reaching out to Jaclyn. I know you've stated before you have little to no interest in working on a book that coverse the visual FX side, but B5 Scrolls has documented this area so well, it'd be almost criminal for you not to be involved. Just my 2p on the matter.

Funnily enough Ron was pushing me to do an unofficial book a while back, and was adamant that Warner wouldn’t give a toss if it was full of previously unreleased artwork. What’s on B5Scrolls, unsurprisingly, is only a small taster in many respects (there's a fair bit of stunning full colour concept art which fans have never seen). jms, of course, has very different views about even the stuff on the website being there.

I know for a fact B5 Books isn’t interested in the material I put together. A while ago someone was asking why there wasn’t a book, and then – without asking me – they contacted B5 Books. It was a while ago but it boiled down to they didn’t consider the interviews to be official or something like that. . . . Which is more than fine – back in 2014/5 the site had already been downloaded over 60,000 times and that was the last time I checked (since the move to the new server no software was in place to track the numbers).

It’s difficult to accurately explain why I don’t want to do one – especially as I could really use the money : ) –but because of what it would contain, it’s like making money off the back of others work, and for me that just doesn’t sit right on some level – if that makes any kind of sense. I just asked some questions ffs. The artists themselves should do the books, and if I could help then great – probably makes me dumb as a post, but there you are. : )

Posting occasionally on here or over on facebook is one thing, but I’m no expert – don’t want to come across as one and certainly don’t want anyone to consider me one. It’s also why, in the past, I’ve turned down interview requests from podcasts and even a print magazine. As Jan can confirm, I even turned down the invite to be one of those running the urban myth facebook group when it was first being discussed and set up. Just last month, someone was trying to line me up with those who run the Trek Yards video thing over on Youtube . . . . again, I’m trying to firmly but politely say no thanks.

As for contacting the artists, these days most of them are on facebook so are only a few keystrokes and one message away - and besides, B5 Books will have a much larger and more comprehensive contact list than I ever did.

[Jan]

As Jan can confirm, I even turned down the invite to be one of those running the urban myth facebook group when it was first being discussed and set up.

True. We appreciate that you've allowed some links, though.

[Jan]

So...I bought the book. And I may or may not finish it, to be honest, because it's getting on my nerves even though I've read less than 10% of it.

Granted, in some ways I *know* I'm nitpicking and I'll try to take that into account but...

I *am* glad to have read the interview with Peter Jurasik. It was interesting to look at Londo through the eyes of the actor who created the character. And the interviewer asked some interesting questions.

First thing that got on my nerves is the formatting which might or might not be an aspect of creating the file for the Kindle. But the heading for each episode

Air order (NOT production number) / Title
Writer
Director
Air Date
(or some variation of this order judging from the first few episodes)

...are all in small type with a section 'STATION DIAGNOSTICS' (yes, all caps) after the episode synopsis in a larger and heavier font.

Secondly but related is what looks like a production number is nothing of the sort. 1.01 should have been the number of the production but it's actually the number of the episode that aired - season 1, episode 1. So 1.01 is "Midnight on the Firing Line" in this book when the actual production number is 103.

Fact/spelling issues. Like I said, I've read less than 10% of the book but in the Peter Jurasik interview there were two errors that didn't bode well in my mind. Lord Refa's name was spelled 'Rifa' in one of Jurasik's responses. Which may have been how he spelled it but it should have been caught. And the interviewer said that JMS wrote 96 out of 110 episodes rather than 92, the correct number.

As for the episode commentaries, I can't really say yet. A couple of times it seemed like they ignored the 'B' story but I don't know yet if this is a trend.

Anybody else have this yet?

[b5historyman]

So...I bought the book. And I may or may not finish it, to be honest, because it's getting on my nerves even though I've read less than 10% of it.

Granted, in some ways I *know* I'm nitpicking and I'll try to take that into account but...

I *am* glad to have read the interview with Peter Jurasik. It was interesting to look at Londo through the eyes of the actor who created the character. And the interviewer asked some interesting questions.

First thing that got on my nerves is the formatting which might or might not be an aspect of creating the file for the Kindle. But the heading for each episode

Air order (NOT production number) / Title
Writer
Director
Air Date
(or some variation of this order judging from the first few episodes)

...are all in small type with a section 'STATION DIAGNOSTICS' (yes, all caps) after the episode synopsis in a larger and heavier font.

Secondly but related is what looks like a production number is nothing of the sort. 1.01 should have been the number of the production but it's actually the number of the episode that aired - season 1, episode 1. So 1.01 is "Midnight on the Firing Line" in this book when the actual production number is 103.

Fact/spelling issues. Like I said, I've read less than 10% of the book but in the Peter Jurasik interview there were two errors that didn't bode well in my mind. Lord Refa's name was spelled 'Rifa' in one of Jurasik's responses. Which may have been how he spelled it but it should have been caught. And the interviewer said that JMS wrote 96 out of 110 episodes rather than 92, the correct number.

As for the episode commentaries, I can't really say yet. A couple of times it seemed like they ignored the 'B' story but I don't know yet if this is a trend.

Anybody else have this yet?

Given that Ensley and Dale had only been on this for about a year, I think they have done a sterling job in such a short time. Ensley did have an issue with one of the drafts with the publishing company but that was sorted. While I was consulted and (along with John Joshua) provided material, as the author, Ensley was free to choose how he used that material.

Yes there are a few spelling mistakes and other small niggly things (I never proof read it) but I've gone through and pointed them out along with corrections and improvements to be made for the second edition. Ensley has thanked me for my assitance on this.

As for the story synopses by all accounts Ensley looks to have taken a similar approach to me when I first did the Historical Database and encourage people to watch the episodes and get some interaction between the two media.

You have only read 10% (about 42 pages) I think you are being a little harsh in rushing to judgement aren't you?

[Jan]

You have only read 10% (about 42 pages) I think you are being a little harsh in rushing to judgement aren't you?

Am I? My comments were almost entirely about fact & formatting which might be forgiven if this was supposed to be a self-publishing project. Since there's a publisher attached, however small, this should be much better done. It really doesn't matter how long the writers have been at it, the publisher should have made them look a lot better. They failed in that.

As for "small niggly things", remember you said that the first time you have to correct a 'production number' that somebody takes from this book. There was no need at all for them to use the production number format but they did. Plus, I bought the book on October 25. The book came out on Sept. 19 according to Amazon. Any errors that had been pointed out between those dates could and should have been corrected by a new file upload for Kindle even if the print version couldn't be corrected.

[b5historyman]

From what I understand from Ensley there will be updates done for the electronic/Kindle version.

I did point out that there were issues with the draft that was sent to the publishers. I can't say anything about them as I have personally not heard of ECW. Again If I could have proof read a copy I would have picked out stuff that did slip through the net.

But in the end people take from it what they want. I came to it with an open mind and the offer of help as I wanted it to be as officially unofficial as possible.

[Jan]

I came to it with an open mind and the offer of help as I wanted it to be as officially unofficial as possible.

Never said you didn't. And since I'm assuming you're not saying that I didn't, it's rather a moot point.