Future of Crusade

[colonyearth]

Actually, the prospect of a B5 trilogy has been buzzed around. I would not be in the least surprised if it happened.

My guess right off, is that there will be an option for a trilogy (so JMS can tell a larger, more epic tale), but the first film will be able to stand alone...in order to see how well it does...while leaving the rest of the trilogy story available and hinted at. Much like ANH did with SW.

If it does well, they contract for the rest of the trilogy...if not...they decide how to proceed from there...or whether to proceed or not.

I'm expecting the film to be a big success!

CE

[Jan]

Originally posted by Capt.Montoya
Amazes the living ú pounds, $ dollars and Ç euros?

You forgot the Yen (Ñ)... and what country uses the @ as currency?

I think that one ( @ ) is Centauri currency isn't it?

Jan

[Capt.Montoya]

Nope, it's Minbari.
@
It's a Minbari Crown, the bone surrounding the head as seen from above.

[bakana]

Nope, it's Minbari.
@
It's a Minbari Crown, the bone surrounding the head as seen from above.

Waitaminit. The Minbari don't USE currency...

[WorkerCaste]

Originally posted by Capt.Montoya
Nope, it's Minbari.
@
It's a Minbari Crown, the bone surrounding the head as seen from above.

LOL

[CRONAN]

::eyes practically rolling out of their sockets::

Por favor, substitute one cuss word for a few random keyboard symbols on this site and suddenly everyones trying to look at it through their own ass in an attempt to figure out what it means. And I forgot this was a jms site.

::cough:: hack::

[grumbler]

Originally posted by KoshN
By doing the above, a book is like a synergy of the visual (TV/Movies) and the written word, and it really comes to life for me. Without that, it's like a random colection of words out of context, as dry as sawdust.

Bummer. There are so many great novels without visualizations that it seems a pity you feel them so "dry as sawdust." Hell, I would bet that there are more books that readers with imaginations prefer to their "visualizations" than there are the reverse. See: the Lord of the Rings. If you think the movies were the definition of that topic, and the charactorizations of the movie were what gave the novel charactors life (and kept them from being dry as sawdust), how do you explain the fact that the novels were the best-selling books of the twentieth century (long before they were bastardized in the 21st century movies)?