Originally posted by Jan
View Post
If Lochley had been on board from the outset it could have been VERY different too. I can imagine some interesting storylines playing out between her and Garibaldi, especially with the shared history of addiction. I could see them being quite close friends / allies. Had she been there for æSurvivorsÆ, I could see their little Season 5 confrontation happening far sooner! There are so many pros and cons. I could see Lochley being just as interesting a character, and perhaps a bit more æin your faceÆ confrontational than Ivanova. She also had an interesting past that could be explored. Lochley could have been a great addition.
HereÆs the thing that gets me about Ivanova not being present for Season 5 - Although IvanovaÆs dealings with the Psi Corps were explored in many B-plots in season one, I felt that more could have been done with it. There were plenty of moment where her past bubbled to the surface (Divided Loyalties) in prominent ways, but it could have been turned into something more interesting had she been around for season 5. That latent hatred for the Corps could have come to the fore at some point, perhaps putting her in a seriously compromising position! I felt a lot of those threads were laid to rest with Talia self-destructing due to the sleeper personality emerging. This could have definitely been explored more.
B5 Trivia:
I only just discovered that the exchange between Kosh and Abbut, monitored by Talia Winters in the episode, "Deathwalker", was to provide a means for Kosh to restore Talia to her real personality using the data recorded by Abbut. That is, if Andrea Thompson had stayed on. Cool stuff, that all makes sense now. I always assumed that Kosh was somehow alluding to using telepaths against the Shadows later on in the war.
Leave a comment: