Hi, all.
First of all, meaning absolutely _no_ disrespect whatsoever to the memory of Rick Biggs, there is nothing in JMS's statement that makes it clear that Franklin was an important part of the TMoS story. He says "because in the writing we/I never imagined he wouldn't be here to be a part of it." All that says is that they always thought he'd be there - not that his part was necessarily a large, or pivotal one in this story.
As for recasting him, I say bleh! I can't imagine that _anyone_ working in connection with this project in _any_ capacity would agree to this. Unless the story actually centered around Dr. Franklin (highly doubtful), there are numerous creative ways the character can be written around. And most likely will be. Not that sf doctors are interchangeable, but can you imagine the first Star Trek film featuring, say, Charles Bronson as Dr. McCoy? Nope. No way, no how. Better to have Franklin working in Earthdome, or depending on the time frame, already quarantined on Earth during the Drakh plague (not likely; I'm guessing - HOPING! - the film takes place between 2263 and 2267).
Regarding using another doctor for storyline purposes, I sure hope it won't be Dr. Chambers! I'm much more fond of Dr. Hobbes, both as a character and because of the level of ability of the respective actresses.
Anyway, it's such a hard time - we want to be happy right now with the great news that there's going to be a Babylon 5 film - news so firm and definitive that we actually have a title! - yet the grief for Rick Biggs is still so fresh, and so sharply defined. It's hard to be human, sometimes.
Aisling
First of all, meaning absolutely _no_ disrespect whatsoever to the memory of Rick Biggs, there is nothing in JMS's statement that makes it clear that Franklin was an important part of the TMoS story. He says "because in the writing we/I never imagined he wouldn't be here to be a part of it." All that says is that they always thought he'd be there - not that his part was necessarily a large, or pivotal one in this story.
As for recasting him, I say bleh! I can't imagine that _anyone_ working in connection with this project in _any_ capacity would agree to this. Unless the story actually centered around Dr. Franklin (highly doubtful), there are numerous creative ways the character can be written around. And most likely will be. Not that sf doctors are interchangeable, but can you imagine the first Star Trek film featuring, say, Charles Bronson as Dr. McCoy? Nope. No way, no how. Better to have Franklin working in Earthdome, or depending on the time frame, already quarantined on Earth during the Drakh plague (not likely; I'm guessing - HOPING! - the film takes place between 2263 and 2267).
Regarding using another doctor for storyline purposes, I sure hope it won't be Dr. Chambers! I'm much more fond of Dr. Hobbes, both as a character and because of the level of ability of the respective actresses.
Anyway, it's such a hard time - we want to be happy right now with the great news that there's going to be a Babylon 5 film - news so firm and definitive that we actually have a title! - yet the grief for Rick Biggs is still so fresh, and so sharply defined. It's hard to be human, sometimes.
Aisling
Comment