With all this talk about posts from 1992, I was wondering if anyone knew the story behind this.
I was watching the special features on one of the DVDs the other day and was listening to Doug Netter talking about how early on they decided that the FX were to be done in CGI.
I was wondering, does anyone know how early on that decision was made, who made it and why. It was a pretty brave move given the quality of previous CGI seen on television and a bit of a radical departure from the well known approach of things like Trek and space 1999 (using physical models) a good few years earlier.
The other aspect of the CG stuff was, I suppose, things like the visual effects in the live action shots. Rather than using wires and (obvious) camera trickery they composited in digital animations and the like.
I was watching the special features on one of the DVDs the other day and was listening to Doug Netter talking about how early on they decided that the FX were to be done in CGI.
I was wondering, does anyone know how early on that decision was made, who made it and why. It was a pretty brave move given the quality of previous CGI seen on television and a bit of a radical departure from the well known approach of things like Trek and space 1999 (using physical models) a good few years earlier.
The other aspect of the CG stuff was, I suppose, things like the visual effects in the live action shots. Rather than using wires and (obvious) camera trickery they composited in digital animations and the like.
Comment